Skip to main content

PeakMetrics / Fact Checks

Economy & business fact checks

Explore claims publishers have checked about economy & business. Read their original ratings and follow the evidence.

7,100 published reviews in this topic

Deutsche Presse-AgenturEconomy & business

Die Handelskette Edeka hat mit dem Spruch "Essen hat einen Preis verdient: den niedrigsten" auf einem Plakat geworben und damit eine Demonstration von Bauern provoziert. Auch im Netz wurde protestiert: "Unsere Lebensmittel haben einen Wert und dieser Wert hat einen Preis", twitterte etwa der Thüringer Bauernverband mit einem Foto des Plakats

Publisher’s rating: Edeka hat mit "Essen" keine Nahrungsmittel, sondern den gleichnamigen Ort nahe Cloppenburg gemeint. Ähnliche Plakate gab es auch in anderen Städten - dann immer mit dem angepassten Spruch.

The claim describes a real Edeka poster and the reaction it prompted, but leaves out the central point of the dispute: “Essen” was intended as the name of a town, not as a reference to food. The review reports that farmers blocked an Edeka distribution warehouse near Oldenburg on the night of January 27, 2020. The poster, featuring Otto Waalkes for the 100th anniversary of Edeka Minden-Hannover, said that “Essen” deserved the lowest price. Farmers objected that the slogan conflicted with Edeka’s message that it loved food. The review says Edeka explained that the campaign referred to the town of Essen near Cloppenburg, and was intended to address towns individually. It also cites posters adapted for other places, including Minden and Bremen, and reports Edeka’s statement that it had not meant to anger farmers or producers. The company removed the posters despite that explanation. The review describes how a photo of the poster circulated online alongside calls to value food more highly. It specifically names the Thüringer Bauernverband’s post, and reports that the Federal Environment Ministry also shared the image and criticized the pricing message. To check where the pictured poster was photographed, the review says it consulted the advertising-site provider’s listings and compared the location with the building at Lange Straße 41 in Essen. It reports that these checks placed the photograph in Essen, supporting Edeka’s explanation that the word referred to the town.

Deutsche Presse-AgenturEconomy & business

Im Vorfeld der "Grünen Woche" (17. bis 26. Januar 2020), der internationalen Messe für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Gartenbau in Berlin, hat Agrarministerin Julia Klöckner in Interviews über die Preise von Lebensmitteln in Deutschland gesprochen. In sozialen Netzwerken kursieren Worte, die ihr in den Mund gelegt werden. Die 47-Jährige soll gesagt haben: "Arme Leute geben viel zuwenig Geld für Lebensmittel aus."

Publisher’s rating: Julia Klöckner hat im Zusammenhang mit Lebensmittelpreisen in Deutschland nicht von armen Leuten gesprochen, die zu wenig Geld für Lebensmittel ausgeben würden. Das bestätigte auch ein Sprecher des Bundesministeriums für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft auf Nachfrage der Deutschen Presse-Agentur (dpa).

Satya Priya BNEconomy & business

Snapdeal is giving away Tata Strome car

Publisher’s rating: FALSE

The review examined messages sent to people after shopping on Snapdeal. The messages claimed that recipients had been selected in a lucky draw for a Tata Safari Storme and asked them to call a number. The review quoted one such message, which also listed a registration fee, and reported that recipients described callers saying they had won the car at random. The review describes several checks: it noted spelling errors in the message, searched the phone number in Truecaller, and used reverse image search on screenshots. It reported that Truecaller identified the number as “Snapdeal Company (Loknath Sanju)” and that similar messages had circulated for years. It also cited Snapdeal’s warning against responding to unsolicited prize calls, emails, or texts, and said the company’s blog explained that such calls were fake. The review’s conclusion was that fraudsters were using Snapdeal’s name, with message details such as phone numbers, prizes, and amounts changing over time. It advised recipients not to answer the calls, pay money, or provide sensitive information. The evidence described concerns the circulating prize messages—not a legitimate Snapdeal promotion for the car.