Skip to main content

PeakMetrics / Fact Checks

Has this been
fact-checked?

Paste a claim or upload an image to find existing fact checks. See what fact-checkers found and read the evidence before you share.

Search fact checks ↓API & integrations ↗

Browse by topic

Explore fact checks by subject.

Latest fact checks

98,154 published reviews
Deutsche Presse-Agentur

Das ZDF hat ein Sharepic erstellt mit der Überschrift "Warum Arschfick guttut"

Publisher’s rating: Das geteilte Sharepic ist manipuliert und stammt so nicht von den Social-Media-Accounts des ZDF.

The review says the purported ZDF sharepic with the headline “Warum Arschfick guttut” is manipulated. It reports that the original ZDF post instead concerned the health benefits of kissing, and that the fake differed by replacing “Küssen” with “Arschfick.”

SBT NewsEconomy & business

Explica: o "fim" do sigilo bancário no Brasil

Publisher’s rating: EXPLICA

The STF decision requires financial institutions to share information about certain electronic payments with state tax authorities when ICMS is involved. The review explains that this does not make the data public or end banking secrecy; access is for tax oversight.

La tempête Boris est l'oeuvre de terrorisme climatique mondial HAARP géo ingénierie chemtrails criminels...

Publisher’s rating: Basé en Alaska, le programme de recherche scientifique HAARP a pour mission d'étudier la haute atmosphère pour pouvoir améliorer les systèmes de télécommunication. Il est incapable de modifier la météo, dont les conditions se produisent dans la basse atmosphère. De plus, la tempête Boris peut s'expliquer par un phénomène météorologique bien connu.

The review says HAARP studies the upper atmosphere and cannot alter weather, which occurs in the lower atmosphere. It attributes Storm Boris to a cold-air pocket meeting warm, humid air, with the storm also influenced by climate change.

Taylor Swift a perdu 150 millions de dollars à cause de son soutien à Kamala Harris.

Publisher’s rating: Il n'existe aucune preuve que Taylor Swift aurait perdu cette somme à la suite de l'annonce de son soutien à Kamala Harris. A l'origine, cette assertion a été diffusée par un site satirique.

The claim originated in a satirical Esspots article, which actually referred to $125 million and alleged an investment in “vegan cryptocurrency.” The review notes that the article’s mention of Swift’s support for Harris appeared in its headline but not in its body.

Where the data comes from

Fact checks come from Data Commons and link to the organizations that published them.

What you’ll find

Each result links to the original fact check. Open it to read the publisher’s findings, with summaries and supporting sources where available.

Report an error

To report an error, send the page URL and supporting evidence.