PeakMetrics / Fact Checks
Has this been
fact-checked?
Paste a claim or upload an image to find existing fact checks. See what fact-checkers found and read the evidence before you share.
Search fact checks ↓API & integrations ↗Browse by topic
Explore fact checks by subject.
Search fact checks
Search by text or imageLatest fact checks
98,043 published reviews
మే 2025లో ఢిల్లీ, ఉత్తరప్రదేశ్ పరిసర ప్రాంతాల్లో ఎన్ఐఏ దాడులు నిర్వహించినప్పుడు పట్టుబడ్డ సూసైడ్ బాంబర్ యొక్క ఫోటో.
Publisher’s rating: MISLEADING
Photos of Jyoti Malhotra with Rahul Gandhi, they suggest her association with the Congress party.
Publisher’s rating: FALSE
media personality Obinna at the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) fleeing the country
Publisher’s rating: Satire
Behauptung: "Das sind Begräbnisstätten. Es gibt tausende von weißen Kreuzen. Das sind alles weiße Farmer und ihre Familien. Sie wurden alle umgebracht". So kommentierte US-Präsident Trumpbei seinem Treffen mit Südafrikas Staatsoberhaupt Cyril Ramaphosa am 21. Mai im Weißen Haus ein von ihm eingeblendetes Video (Video, Minute 24.25).
Publisher’s rating: DW-Faktencheck: Falsch Trumps Behauptung kursierte bereits vor dem Staatsbesuch von Ramaphosa in den USA in den Sozialen Medien. So erklärte ein User auf X bereits am 12. Mai, dass jedes Kreuz für einen ermordeten weißen Farmer in Südafrika stehe. Der Video Postwurde knapp 55 Millionen Mal angeklickt (Stand 22.Mai). Eine Bilderrückwärtssuche zeigt, dass das von Trump verwendete Filmmaterial mit den weißen Kreuzen am Straßenrand bereits 2020und 2023in den Sozialen Medien kursierte. Es handelt sich dabei nicht, wie von Trump behauptet, um die Grabstätten von mehr als tausend ermordeten Farmern. Die Szenen zeigen stattdessen eine Protestaktion nahe der südafrikanischen Stadt Newcastle am 5. September Jahr 2020. Der Protest wurde durch die Ermordung des Ehepaars Glen und Vida Rafferty auf ihrer Farm im August 2020 ausgelöst.
Pendaftaran atau penerimaan Calon Pegawai Negeri Sipil (CPNS) 2025 di situs https://pendaftarancpns2025.ylijili.com/
Publisher’s rating: Salah
Sultratop.com reports that the website did not lead to an official government domain or show official government affiliation. It says the site requested users’ full names as listed on their e-KTP and Telegram numbers, and identifies SSCASN at sscasn.bkn.go.id as the official national ASN registration site. The review also reports that, as of mid-May 2025, the government had not announced an official 2025 CPNS registration schedule.
![Image accompanying A video shows "Burial sites [for] over a thousand of white farmers" in South Africa.](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Trump-South-Africa-720-x-307.png)
A video shows "Burial sites [for] over a thousand of white farmers" in South Africa.
Publisher’s rating: Misleading
سرطان یک تجارت است و روشهای رایج درمان سرطان مانند شیمیدرمانی و رادیوتراپی مضرند.
Publisher’s rating: شاخدار
Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. is the original author of the Universal Access to Quality Tertiary Education Act.
Publisher’s rating: False
選択的夫婦別姓が実現すると戸籍制度が崩壊する?
Publisher’s rating: 誤り
The claim circulated on X, TikTok, YouTube and Threads that allowing married couples to choose separate surnames would destroy Japan’s family registry system. The review examined what the proposed arrangement would change and whether it would remove the registry’s functions. It describes the proposal as letting couples who want to do so keep their pre-marriage surnames, while leaving the existing option to adopt one spouse’s surname in place. The review sets that change against the registry’s stated role: recording and certifying Japanese citizens’ nationality and family relationships, and recording events such as marriage and divorce. It reports that former Justice Ministers had addressed the concern in parliamentary proceedings: in 2024, Justice Minister Ryūji Koizumi said the registry’s function and importance would not change if the system were introduced; the review also quotes similar statements by Ken Saito in 2023 and Yoko Kamikawa in 2021. The review also reports that the Constitutional Democratic Party’s bill, submitted on April 30, 2025, would let couples choose a shared surname or keep their respective pre-marriage surnames, with the child’s surname decided at marriage. In response to the review’s inquiry, the party said its proposal assumed that a married couple with different surnames and their children could be recorded in one registry entry, and that the bill would not alter the registry system. On the evidence presented, the claim that the registry would collapse confuses changing surname rules with abolishing or disabling the registry’s role in documenting nationality and family relationships.
In the House bill, “we’re not changing Medicaid,” only cutting “waste, fraud and abuse.”
Publisher’s rating: False
Ce post Facebook prétendant montrer l’inhumation de 61 combattants du Wazalendo, des FARDC et du FDLR
Publisher’s rating: False
"These are burial sites right here. Burial sites. Over a thousand of white farmers."
Publisher’s rating: Crosses were part of a procession in memory of a couple who was killed
Where the data comes from
Fact checks come from Data Commons and link to the organizations that published them.
What you’ll find
Each result links to the original fact check. Open it to read the publisher’s findings, with summaries and supporting sources where available.
Report an error
To report an error, send the page URL and supporting evidence.