PeakMetrics / Fact Checks
Technology & AI fact checks
Explore claims publishers have checked about technology & ai. Read their original ratings and follow the evidence.
Search fact checks
Search by text or image1,813 published reviews in this topic
Video proves Bitcoin suffered its first quantum attack leading to stolen funds on April 25, 2026, as a social media post showing lines of code implied.
Publisher’s rating: False. The video in the post shows lines of code of Ubuntu, a free and open-source software to install Linux. The post does not offer credible evidence that the first quantum attack on Bitcoin occurred. There are no credible news reports of the supposed quantum attack having happened today. Experts generally agree that the possibility of the first quantum attack on bitcoin is years away, and that there is no immediate threat.
نقل قول منتسب به وزیر ارتباطات: مردم به شبکه ملی اطلاعات عادت کردند و همین رویه قطع اینترنت را حفظ میکنیم.
Publisher’s rating: نادرست
If Iran attacks an undersea internet cable, Sri Lankan data stored abroad will be wiped out.
Publisher’s rating: Misleading
The review says submarine cables transmit data rather than store it, and that damaging them could disrupt access or slow internet speeds without erasing data stored in data centers. It cites Sri Lankan officials who said a Red Sea cable attack would not delete data stored in Sri Lanka or abroad.
ایرانیها به اینترنت دسترسی دارند، اما فقط برای سایتها و برنامههای داخلی
Publisher’s rating: شاخدار
எழவு வீட்டுல கூடவா டா AI use பண்ணுவீங்க?? க்ர்ர்ர் த்தூ!! நல்லாவே இருக்க மாடீங்கடா டேய்!!
Publisher’s rating: false
پاول دوروف: حساب کاربران ایرانی در دوران جنگ، به خاطر عدم فعالیت حذف نخواهند شد
Publisher’s rating: نادرست
ادعای انتشار یک ویدیوی ساخت هوش مصنوعی سخنرانی بنیامین نتانیاهو
Publisher’s rating: نادرست
ادعای هکشدن شبکه بیبیسی فارسی به مدت یک دقیقه بهدست سربازان گمنام امام زمان
Publisher’s rating: نادرست
اینترنت به دلایل امنیتی جنگ بسته است، هر کشوری برای مقابله با جنگ، اقدامات اضطراری مانند این را انجام میدهد.
Publisher’s rating: گمراهکننده
Viral Video Claiming Attack on Dubai’s Burj Al Arab Is AI-Generated
Publisher’s rating: AI generated
Fact Hunter’s review says the video posted on March 3, 2026, falsely depicted a missile strike on the Burj Al Arab. It contrasts the video’s explosion with Dubai officials’ account of a minor fire caused by debris from an intercepted drone, and notes visual anomalies and an AI-detection result. The review concludes the footage was fabricated.
وقتی «گروک» اشتباه میکند: بررسی عملکرد بات X در راستیآزمایی تصاویر جنگ
Publisher’s rating: بررسی نمونههای مختلف نشان میدهد که گروک در موارد متعددی نتوانسته پاسخهای دقیقی ارائه دهد و گاه حتی باعث گمراهی بیشتر شده است.
Publisher’s rating: Google
http://69bot69.blogspot.com/?{{[[a'12321t1z7xqqq]]}}<img src=xt1z7x onerror=print(1)>2
Publisher’s rating: http://69bot69.blogspot.com/?{{[[a'12321t1z7xqqq]]}}<img src=xt1z7x onerror=print(1)>6
China will launch the world's first "pregnancy robot" in 2026, capable of carrying a human fetus and giving birth to a live baby.
Publisher’s rating: False
Fact Crescendo Sri Lanka found no credible evidence or official announcement supporting the claimed 2026 launch. It says current artificial-womb research remains experimental and has not achieved full human gestation from conception to birth.
கம்ப்யூட்டர் கோடிங் லாங்குவேஜ் பற்றி கேட்டால்.... உனக்கு பிடித்த லாங்குவேஜ் எது ? சமஸ்கிருதம்
Publisher’s rating: false
A dozen humanoid robots stand in front of a snow-covered mountain range. They hold machine guns and run across a shooting range, kneeling down to shoot at targets and change magazines, then maneuvering through an obstacle course. The setting for these scenes in a 48-second video currently circulating on social media is supposedly China, with the national flag flying in the background. But is it real?
Publisher’s rating: DW Fact Check: Fake The robots in the video are based on the G1 model by Chinese company Unitree Robotics. But the scenes were clearly created using artificial intelligence. While some users have at least suggested that the video could be AI-generated, they have continued to post it with false claims. Using a reverse image search of a still image from the video, DW Fact Check found a higher-resolution, slightly shorter version on YouTube that reveals more details. Frame-by-frame analysis revealed several AI-typical inconsistencies that could not have been created in the editing process. In the middle of the video, a robot reloads a magazine. Two seconds later, the magazine has disappeared without a trace under the rifle barrel. A person can be seen giving a shooting order while holding a radio in one hand. When he raises his hand, it merges with the device to form a single mass. Two cars in the background are deformed and appear to be fused together. A robot moves through a stack of sandbags like a ghost, without stepping over them. The lettering on the robot's chest disappears repeatedly and only partially resembles the company name "Unitree" where it typically appears on the real G1 model. Philipp Cachee, an expert in forensic ballistics, also points out logical errors in the video. "There is no shell ejection in at least two places, and at 0:23, an empty magazine is loaded into the weapon," he said, concluding that it is "almost certainly" an AI-generated video. The video is in fact labeled as such on on Bilibili, a video platform popular in China where it has also been uploaded.
Video shows actual footage of China’s robotic military
Publisher’s rating: False/Altered
高市首相の動画で、視聴回数より高評価の数が多いのは不正?
Publisher’s rating: 不正確
A screenshot taken about an hour after the video was posted showed more likes than views, but YouTube metrics can take time to appear. By February 12, the video had over 400,000 views and 36,000 likes.
پلتفرم X برای اولین بار و بهطور رسمی زیر پستهای علی خامنهای برچسبهای Community Notes اضافه کرده است.
Publisher’s rating: نادرست
中道改革連合の街頭演説会に集まった聴衆の動画はAI生成?
Publisher’s rating: 誤り
The review identifies the footage as showing a February 1, 2026, Centrist Reform Coalition rally at Fukuoka’s Kego Park. It reports that a livestream archive filmed from other angles also showed a large crowd, while AI tools gave conflicting assessments; the review concludes that the claim the video was AI-generated is unsupported by the evidence presented.