PeakMetrics / Fact Checks
Politics & government fact checks
Explore claims publishers have checked about politics & government. Read their original ratings and follow the evidence.
Search fact checks
Search by text or image12,749 published reviews in this topic
Eu fui por quatro vezes o melhor prefeito do Brasil
Publisher’s rating: Exagerado
[São Paulo] Foi eleita pela CGU, pela Controladoria Geral da União, a cidade mais transparente do Brasil
Publisher’s rating: Verdadeiro, mas...
Eu criei a Controladoria Geral do Município [de São Paulo]
Publisher’s rating: Verdadeiro
Bongbong Marcos cried during an interview with Toni Gonzaga after he was labeled a "party animal"
Publisher’s rating: Satire
Eu, na prefeitura de São Paulo [...], aprovei todos os projetos encaminhados à Câmara Municipal
Publisher’s rating: Falso
പാർട്ടിയുടെ കൊടിക്ക് മഹത്വം ഉണ്ടെന്നും സംരംഭങ്ങളുടെ മുന്നിൽ നാട്ടാനുള്ളതല്ലെന്നും അതെന്നും പി രാജീവ്
Publisher’s rating: FALSE
Ghulam Nabi Azad met Home Minister Amit Shah in the presence of Samant Kumar much before he left the Cong party . In fact he was Modified when he got the Third highest civilian award the Padma Bhushan award from the PM and was promised a RS seat .Fa
Publisher’s rating: Fake
ഗോവയില് കോണ്ഗ്രസ് എംഎല്എമാര് ബിജെപിയില് ചേര്ന്നതോടെ ഗോവ കോണ്ഗ്രസിന്റെ ഫെയ്സ്ബുക്ക് പേജും പേര് മാറ്റി
Publisher’s rating: FALSE
Hier spricht ein Abgeordneter der Grünen.
Publisher’s rating: Der angebliche Grünen-Abgeordnete ist tatsächlich ein Bundestagsabgeordneter der AfD. Das Video zeigt also nicht, was behauptet wird.
The claim attached to the video identifies the speaker as a Green Party member of the Bundestag. The dpa review says the clip shows a speech by Thomas Ehrhorn at the Bundestag on 15 May 2020, but that Ehrhorn belongs to the AfD, not the Greens. It reports that his party affiliation and Bundestag membership could be checked against the Bundestag’s official biography: the review states that “Ein Blick auf die offizielle Biografie des Bundestages erlaubt keinen Zweifel hinsichtlich seiner Identität.” The review also checked the speech’s parliamentary record. It says Ehrhorn’s remarks can be read in the verbatim record of the 161st sitting of the 19th legislative period, beginning on page 20022. In the debate about a new traffic-fines catalogue, Ehrhorn described what he presented as green policy, including a threat to motorists. The words in the clip therefore do not establish that the speaker is a Green politician; the review identifies them as Ehrhorn’s portrayal of what green policy would mean. The post’s attribution also named “Thomas Ehrhorn (Grüne),” but the review says that attribution was false. It reports that a version of the video had circulated on Facebook since spring 2021 and later appeared in a post in Luxembourg. The underlying footage is described as an authentic excerpt of Ehrhorn’s Bundestag speech; the misleading element was the accompanying identification of him as a Green member.
यह वीडियो कांग्रेस के भारत जोड़ो यात्रा का है।
Publisher’s rating: Missing Context
फोटो में गुलाम नबी आजाद को कांग्रेस छोड़ने से पहले अमित शाह और रॉ के डायरेक्टर से मिलते देखा जा सकता है
Publisher’s rating: FALSE
गुलाम नबी आजाद ने पार्टी छोड़ने से पहले केंद्रीय गृह मंत्री अमित शाह के आवास पर उनसे मुलाकात की।
Publisher’s rating: False
De City of London is geen deel van het Verenigd Koninkrijk en de Britse monarch is er dan ook geen staatshoofd.
Publisher’s rating: De City of London heeft een speciaal statuut, maar is wel gewoon deel van het Verenigd Koninkrijk. De monarch van het Verenigd Koninkrijk is dan ook hier de soeverein. Vaticaanstad is wel een soevereine staat, Washington D.C. niet.
The claim concerns the City of London, a small district in central London, and asserts both that it lies outside the United Kingdom and that the British monarch is not its sovereign. The review identifies a 2017 Russia Today broadcast as the source of the argument: it linked a supposed requirement for the monarch to ask permission to enter the City with the conclusion that the City had no sovereign. The review says that conclusion rests on a mistaken reading of a historical custom. The article distinguishes the City of London from both the wider city of London and the City of Westminster. It describes the City as a district within urban London with a special status, and cites its inclusion on the UK’s list of cities, its UK government web address, and its representation in the UK Parliament. It also gives a geographic argument: the City is on the island of Great Britain, which the article identifies as part of the UK, and there is no national border running along the Thames. On the monarch question, the review explains that the custom at the City’s boundary is ceremonial. The Lord Mayor meets the monarch and offers a sword, a gesture the article says recognizes the monarch’s authority; it does not mean that the monarch lacks sovereignty there. The review notes that the City’s website had described Elizabeth II as sovereign, and says that after her death on September 8, 2022, and Charles’s accession, Charles was sovereign, represented by the Lord Mayor. The article separately contrasts the City with Vatican City, which it identifies as sovereign, and Washington, D.C., which it says is part of the United States.





