PeakMetrics / Fact Checks
Health & medicine fact checks
Explore claims publishers have checked about health & medicine. Read their original ratings and follow the evidence.
Search fact checks
Search by text or image13,677 published reviews in this topic
World Economic Forum event is evidence that global leaders are planning a new pandemic called Disease X.
Publisher’s rating: False
"Neumonia misteriosa ya está golpeando" a niños en Estados Unidos "lo mismo que está pasando en China".
Publisher’s rating: False
Significantly more people died of Covid-19 in two months than died of overdoses all of last year or the year before.
Publisher’s rating: True
“Una aguja puede salvar la vida de una persona teniendo un derrame cerebral”.
Publisher’s rating: False
Older people are getting needles stuck in their arms but a COVID-19 vaccine is not being pushed in
Publisher’s rating: Needs Context
"COVID-19 is not a respiratory virus of any kind. It is actually venom poisoning."
Publisher’s rating: False
The CDC's death rate estimates for COVID-19 are "classifying people who have 1 or 2 jabs as ‘unvaccinated.'"
Publisher’s rating: False
A “public health warning” was recently issued for fluoride toothpaste.
Publisher’s rating: False
Pop-Tarts and other foods “have antifreeze in them.”
Publisher’s rating: False
Fotos von einer Desinfektionsmittel-Flasche werden bei Facebook geteilt. Auf dem Etikett wird behauptet, das Spray wirke unter anderem gegen das Coronavirus. Dies wird in einem Post vom 9. März 2020 kommentiert: "Produktionsjahr 2014!!!". Und weiter: "Ich denke diesen Virus gibt es noch nicht so lange."
Publisher’s rating: Coronaviren sind schon seit Jahrzehnten bekannt - die aktuell grassierende Coronavirus-Art dagegen ist neu.
The post used the bottle’s stated production year, 2014, to suggest that the coronavirus named on the disinfectant’s label could not be a real target because the virus did not yet exist. The review identifies the pictured product as Vibasept and says its manufacturer’s product information listed effectiveness against “Coronavirus (SARS).” It therefore distinguishes the label’s reference to coronaviruses from the specific newly identified coronavirus spreading in 2020; the product label alone does not establish that the spray was tested against that new virus. The review explains that coronaviruses are a family of viruses, and that the virus spreading at the time was a newly discovered member of that family. It reports that the first infections were traced by many accounts to December 2019 and the Huanan market in Wuhan, China. It also says the first coronaviruses had been identified in the mid-1960s, citing the RKI. Thus, the 2014 date does not contradict the existence of coronaviruses, though it does not by itself prove efficacy against the newly identified virus. The review also distinguishes the virus from the disease it causes: it says WHO initially called the new virus nCov, later named it SARS-CoV-2 on February 11, and called the resulting lung disease Covid-19. Its central distinction is between the longstanding coronavirus family and the particular new virus—not between a virus that existed in 2014 and one that did not.
With Medicare for All, "study after study has shown that ... the average middle-class families will save $3,000 each and every year on their health care bills."
Publisher’s rating: Mostly False
Senior citizens have until Jan. 31 to apply for “free dental work” under a recently announced Medicare “stimulus.”
Publisher’s rating: False
A video shows an animal chip scanner detecting a microchip where a woman was vaccinated.
Publisher’s rating: Pants on Fire
“Chelsea Clinton: ‘It’s Time To Force-Jab Every Unvaccinated Child in America.’”
Publisher’s rating: False
"Biden y los Dems están yendo a la puerta de su casa para forzarlo a recibir la vacuna" contra el COVID-19.
Publisher’s rating: No hay pruebas
















