PeakMetrics / Fact Checks
Elections & voting fact checks
Explore claims publishers have checked about elections & voting. Read their original ratings and follow the evidence.
Search fact checks
Search by text or image5,412 published reviews in this topic
Cette vidéo montre Jimmy Carter aller voter pour Kamala Harris.
Publisher’s rating: Jimmy Carter a bien voté pour Kamala Harris, mais l'a fait par correspondance. La vidéo utilisée par les internautes a été prise lors de la fête organisée à l'occasion de ses 100 ans. Elle n'a donc rien à voir avec l'élection présidentielle.
Video shows “Karl Rove rallying support for Kamala Harris yesterday in Pennsylvania.”
Publisher’s rating: False
Das Video zeigt Jimmy Carter bei der Stimmabgabe für Kamala Harris.
Publisher’s rating: Carter hat seine Stimme per Briefwahl abgegeben - das Video zeigt ihn an seinem Geburtstag und steht damit nicht in Zusammenhang.
Ex-ministro Silvio Almeida teria pedido apoio para a campanha de Boulos nas eleições de 2024
Publisher’s rating: Falso
The review found that the video showed Silvio Almeida supporting Guilherme Boulos’s 2022 federal deputy campaign, not his 2024 mayoral campaign. It says the misleading version was edited to remove references to the 2022 election and federal office.
Boulos passou Marçal na mesma hora que Lula passou Bolsonaro e Dilma passou Aécio nas Eleições
Publisher’s rating: FALSO
The review says the claim is false: Boulos overtook Marçal at 18:40, not the claimed 18:45. Dilma overtook Aécio at 19:32 in 2014, while Lula overtook Bolsonaro at 20:02 in the first round of 2022; Lula’s second-round overtake was at 18:44.
Harris/Walz campaign ad trying to appeal to young male voters.
Publisher’s rating: Misleading
Las hojas de votación con la cara del presidente Lacalle Pou serán anuladas
Publisher’s rating: Falso
Tim Walz said, “We can't have four more years of this" about the Biden-Harris administration
Publisher’s rating: Misleading
“Boric propone a Gonzalo Winter como su próximo candidato a presidente”: #Falso
Publisher’s rating: Falso
Vídeo mostra trabalhadores da Comlurb envolvidos no transporte de urnas eletrônicas em um galpão no Rio de Janeiro. A legenda do post diz: “que eu saiba é trabalho para funcionários designados pelo Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE) e não à prefeitura. Não digo que houve fraude, mas é sem dúvidas extremamente suspeito!”. De forma irônica, um homem diz no vídeo que “o processo é realmente legítimo e legal”.
Publisher’s rating: Contextualizando
Brasil está sendo despetizado e PT só ganha em 46 cidades
Publisher’s rating: FALSO
The review reports that the PT elected 248 mayors in the first round of Brazil’s 2024 municipal elections, up from 179 in 2020. It also notes that the party was still competing in 13 municipalities in the second round. [S1]
Alexandre de Moraes teria mandado trocar urnas para fraudar eleições
Publisher’s rating: Falso
Lula ganha do Bolsonaro após a mudança da tela nas eleições de 2022
Publisher’s rating: ENGANOSO
The screenshot showed Paraná’s vote count, where Bolsonaro was ahead of Lula; it did not show the nationwide result. The review says Lula was leading nationally at that point, and TSE data confirmed his victory in the election.
Video shows former U.S. Vice President Mike Pence endorsing Kamala Harris ahead of the 2024 presidential elections.
Publisher’s rating: Misleading
Kamala Harris s'effondre (sous-entendu dans les sondages), comme le montre ce graphique.
Publisher’s rating: Non, la capture d'écran montre un pari sur Polymarket, un site de prédictions où n'importe qui peut miser. Les courbes y fluctuent de jour en jour. Les derniers sondages annoncent une course très serrée, avec Kamala Harris et Donald Trump au coude-à-coude.
The graph tracks betting on Polymarket, not voters’ stated intentions in an official poll; its odds fluctuate as users place bets. The review says the candidates were neck and neck in polling, rather than Harris collapsing.
He did padyatra , he did 100 + rallies and supported every candidate but what did he got? Defeat. This just breaks my heart
Publisher’s rating: misleading






