PeakMetrics / Fact Checks
Elections & voting fact checks
Explore claims publishers have checked about elections & voting. Read their original ratings and follow the evidence.
Search fact checks
Search by text or image5,413 published reviews in this topic
Deze video toont verkiezingsfraude in de staat New York.
Publisher’s rating: De video toont cijfers op de website van een privé-bedrijf dat verkiezingsrapportage doet. Het gaat hier dus niet om officiële cijfers, en is dus ook geen bewijs van fraude.
The video concerns the November 2022 New York governor’s race between Kathy Hochul and Lee Zeldin. It shows Decision Desk HQ, a private company that reports election results, displaying identical figures across several districts. The review says the footage showed the site as it appeared at 20:33 on November 8, 2022, and notes that the figures prompted claims of fraud. The fact that the video showed a reporting error, however, does not establish that votes were manipulated. The review compared the video’s figures with other reported totals and with New York’s official election results. In the video, Decision Desk HQ displayed 6,606,899 votes counted, while the company later reported that only 68 percent—about four million votes—had been counted. The video’s repeated district result was 63.1 percent for Zeldin and 39.9 percent for Hochul, based on 54,375 votes, more than the number of registered voters in four of the districts shown. The review also says the official state breakdown showed that no county ultimately had identical results. An archived State Board of Elections tally, updated about an hour after the video, showed a different result and far fewer counted votes. The review explains that Decision Desk HQ is not the official source for New York election results and uses predictive software to report results quickly. It concludes that the displayed figures were erroneous, but says their cause was unknown; the discrepancy itself was not evidence of election fraud.
Publicação no TikTok que reproduzia trecho de live do deputado federal Coronel Tadeu (PL-SP) junto com o empresário argentino Fernando Cerimedo em que eles afirmavam existir seções eleitorais com 1,5 mil eleitores, o que seria indicativo de fraude eleitoral. No vídeo, eles alegam que, como o tempo médio de votação de um eleitor no primeiro turno era de um minuto e as seções eleitorais ficam abertas por 540 minutos (9 horas, das 8h às 17h), não seria possível haver seções eleitorais que tivessem mais de 540 eleitores. “Se uma pessoa leva um minuto para votar, só pode no máximo 540”. “Você tem 9h de votação, 540 min. Se ele encontrou 1.500 votos em uma urna que só podia ter 540 significa que cada pessoa votou em 20 segundos”. “É sinal de que votos foram inseridos na urna”, concluem.
Publisher’s rating: Falso
URNAS FORAM ENCONTRADAS DESCARTADAS ILEGALMENTE NO DMLU DE PORTO ALEGRE
Publisher’s rating: Falso
यह गुजरात और हिमाचल प्रदेश के चुनाव के एक्जिट पोल के आंकड़ें है।
Publisher’s rating: Missing Context
Post no Facebook com print de suposta reportagem da Jovem Pan News com o título “O presidente da Holanda confirma que teve fraude na eleição presidencial no Brasil”. Na legenda, o autor escreve: “Argentina, Espanha, Itália e agora Holanda.. enfim o mundo já está reconhecendo a fraude eleitoral no Brasil”.
Publisher’s rating: Falso
गुजरात में चुनाव प्रचार के दौरान बीजेपी कैंडिडेट को जूतों की माला पहनाने का वीडियो
Publisher’s rating: FALSE
Video showing the recent 2022 election results of Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh
Publisher’s rating: MISLEADING
The review examines two separate videos being circulated as showing recent 2022 election results: one about Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh, and another about Madhya Pradesh. It does not describe one video covering all three states. The review says the Gujarat and Himachal video was an older News18 India clip and that the Madhya Pradesh video showed results from an earlier Assembly election.
गुजरात चुनाव के एग्जिट पोल में आम आदमी पार्टी को 125 सीटें मिलते दिखाता ग्राफिक
Publisher’s rating: FALSE
Títulos de eleitor encontrados no lixo provam fraude nas eleições
Publisher’s rating: Falso
Dois posts no Twitter replicam um tuíte do deputado federal Paulo Teixeira (PT-SP) em que ele menciona uma “recontagem” de votos que lhe permitiu a reeleição. As postagens questionam se o direito à recontagem é parcial, em favor apenas do PT, e por qual razão não foi concedido para a eleição presidencial, como desejam apoiadores do presidente Jair Bolsonaro (PL). Um dos posts questiona: “A recontagem existe desde que seja a favor de um determinado espectro político?” O outro afirma: “Milhões de brasileiros que votaram no PRES Bolsonaro não podem sequer questionar alguma coisa. Muito democrático. Se o Jair Bolsonaro se declarar um trans-petista ele terá o mesmo direito?”.
Publisher’s rating: Falso
Nostradamus foresaw the election of Bongbong Marcos
Publisher’s rating: False
هل اعتماد بري لنصاب الثلثين في جلسات انتخاب رئيس الجمهورية مخالف للدستور؟
Publisher’s rating: غير صحيح











