Skip to main content

PeakMetrics / Fact Checks

Economy & business fact checks

Explore claims publishers have checked about economy & business. Read their original ratings and follow the evidence.

7,106 published reviews in this topic

FactCheck.orgEconomy & business

"Fill out this census form so you can get your stimulus check. That's how they going to know where to send the checks."

Publisher’s rating: False

The post said that people should complete the 2020 census form to receive a stimulus check, adding that the census would tell the government where to send payments. The review identifies the post as circulating on Facebook while the Trump administration and Congress were negotiating coronavirus relief payments. It addresses the same claim as the one assessed here: “Go to 2020census.gov and fill out this census form so you can get your stimulus check. That’s how they going to know where to send the checks,” the post claims. The review’s central evidence is that census responses could not determine eligibility for government benefits, including potential stimulus payments. It quotes the 2020 census website: “Your [census] answers cannot be used to impact your eligibility for any government benefits, including any potential stimulus package.” The article also describes the payment plan under discussion: it says the proposed Senate bill would use tax returns, not census information, to decide eligibility and payment amounts. The review therefore distinguishes the census’s purpose from the separate process for determining relief payments. The article says that the Constitution requires a census every 10 years to count the population, determine each state’s representation, and distribute federal funds, but that census participation was not a condition for receiving coronavirus relief. Its April 1 update reports that the president signed the $2 trillion stimulus package into law on March 27 and summarizes payment amounts and income thresholds. The update supplies later detail about the enacted package; it does not change the article’s explanation that census responses were not used to determine eligibility.